Tom Watson or not?

Yesterday (September 20th) Labour’s NEC proposed the abolition of deputy leader – a post occupied currently by Tom Watson – and later withdrew the proposal on the advice of Jeremy Corbyn.  The proposal was both a tactic to test the balance of power in Labour and also a reaction to Watson’s latest shenanigans aimed at damaging the party’s plans for Brexit and for a general election.

TomWatsonDoor.jpg
How soon is now?

Whether or not Watson is deputy leader is not the most important issue for Labour.  Watson is annoying and untrustworthy and he is media’s favourite “source” but he is no more than a place-holder for obstruction.  Corbyn made a sensible pragmatic decision by dismissing the attempt to abolish deputy leader.

Reaction
Dramatic crafted reactions to the proposed abolition were as predictable as a Coldplay intro.  Faux-despair included claims that the plan was damaging to Labour’s electoral chances.

Labour Conference this week needs to put the Party on a general election footing – talking to the country about our vision for Britain.  For Jon Lansman and Momentum  to try and remove our Deputy Leader Tom Watson isn’t just outrageous, it’s self-destructive and must stop.” – Wes Streeting

An eve of election conference.  The country crying out for opposition to the Tories.  But purge Tom Watson for reflecting Labour members & voters views on Brexit?  Tear our Party apart? If true – totally insane.” – Ben Bradshaw

Such claims side-stepped the fact that Watson’s recent announcement of his support for a second referendum instead of an election was a plan specifically designed to stop Labour fighting and winning an election.

The ham-acted response descended into reds-under-the-bed drivel.

Complete madness from Momentum.  This is nothing more than a self-serving power grab from the party leadership, attempting to silence all differences of opinion.  It’s dogmatic, divisive and destructive.” – Margaret Hodge

Good to see that the sectarian, undemocratic and vindictive attempt to abolish our own elected Dep Leader Tom Watson as been defeated – but the attempt is the perfect illustration that the fifth columnists who have infiltrated Labour won’t stop until they have destroyed us.” – Owen Smith

Apparently, anonymous Labour sources bombarded media hacks with their opinions.  Most of the sources appeared to be part-time writers for The Twilight Zone.

Speaking to well placed source, Lansman prepping for GE loss/ Corbyn resignation and wanting to stop Watson from overseeing the leadership contest.” – Lewis Goodall, Sky

What will Corbyn do? This NEC could prove seismic. MP tells me ‘all bets are off.’  ‘This not just attack on Tom.  It’s an attack on our mainstream democratic socialist & pro-European tradition,’ ‘taking a step a time…but it’s hard to see how Party would survive this in one piece.’ ” – Beth Rigby, Sky

Parliamentary Labour Party officers write to NEC re . Tom Watson: ‘Today’s outrageous proposals to remove the position of Deputy Leader of the Labour Party are counterproductive, entirely factional and undermines the unity that the party have been striving for.’ ” – Iain Watson, BBC

BBC’s Iain Watson was the giddiest with excitement about the story that any political journalist could be about anything and he had his wingman Chris Mason by his side.

ChrisMasonBBCWatson

To be fair, Sky’s Tom Rayner and ITV’s Paul Brand, the latter famous for his full in depth investigation of Jeremy Corbyn waiting for a lift, were equally as excited.  Brand had a source for every daft opinion he could muster.

Alternative theory is that this was all a complete disaster for Corbynite wing.  They thought they had numbers at last night’s NEC and Corbyn wasn’t there to have blood on his hands.  But failed attempt meant pressure built against the coup and all fell spectacularly apart.”

Panic
The Tom Watson incident was a catalyst for cahooting hacks and Progress MPs to demonstrate how they intend to behave throughout the Labour Party conference.  Their behaviour was unsurprising.  Both hiveminds revel in their denigration of Labour.  A looming election with the possibility of a left-leaning government scares them.  It will not take much for their drama and outrage to be to the fore.

The hacks will avoid reporting positive Labour policies.

Advertisement
Tom Watson or not?

3 thoughts on “Tom Watson or not?

  1. Dave says:

    What exactly is the job of the Labour whips, i sent them a comment not long ago, telling them to do the job of bringing Watson to account, can they actually remove the whip, or are they shit house supporters of him?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s