“Manacled to the city, manacled to the city
Those big big big wide streets
Those useless MPs
Those useless MPs
Hit the North“
Mark E. Smith
Whenever a Tory government abuses the north of England, which is whenever a Tory government exists, support for separation from Westminster increases. That is a reactive response to iniquities imposed on people in the north by the Tories and is an understandable and intelligent response.
It is possible for a left-leaning party to be elected in UK general election but even a government with genuine intent to make radical changes would be hampered severely by constitutional structure (House of Lords, royalty, parliamentary procedure, etc.), by ingrained opposition in judiciary, by historical “ownership” of property and land, by mayhem of the stock exchange, by allegiance of police and armed forces to the head of state (or the “crown“), by GCHQ, by MI5, and by layered webs of financial and physical control that persist as malodorous residue of Britain’s long power-broker history of corruption, theft, violence and old school ties.
Necessary changes to law to rid the public of all “checks and balances” listed above, also known as legacy obstacles , would be absurdly time-consuming and would be challenged continuously via a court system peopled by opponents to the changes and those challenges would be funded without limit by extremely wealthy corporations and institutions determined to stop their gravy trains being derailed.
One option to create a quicker and more effective adjustment is revolution but generating sufficient popular support is highly unlikely in the current epoch and there would be little international support. The absence of the latter would allow senior military personnel to direct resistance with impunity.
Independence could achieve similar objectives to revolution. It could enable a break from all legacy obstacles immediately. Potential opposition to removal of obstacles could be significantly reduced in capability via simple constitutional directions within a declaration of independence. Any necessary or desired partial replacements could be constructed so that they serve the public rather than wealthy detached elite.
There would be some international support for independence. Popular support in the north for independence would be greater than support for a nationwide revolution. Independence is a path to revolutionary change that avoids some of the difficulties of a revolution.
Support independence for the north to rid ourselves of centuries-old embedded undemocratic power.
 legacy obstacles n. Features of the structure of a system of government that hamper revolutionary change